← Search

Michiyo Pedersen

Holly Springs, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
172 matches · 87W–85L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Michiyo Pedersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history172 matches
W
2026-09-08 · CAS.Pedersen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Bechtholdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-28 · CAS.Belyea · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Julie Artieri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-21 · CAS.Belyea · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michelle Chiaramonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · CAS.Pedersen · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christy Mroczkiewicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Erin Nelson / Jennifer Smith
2026-08-11 · CAS.Pedersen · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dell Pinkston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-07 · CAS.Belyea · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Anu Bhagawan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-04 · CAS.Pedersen · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele Freiburghouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · NMAC.DeCandia · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nelda VanAarde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-28 · CAS.Pedersen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana McNally
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-22 · CAS.Pedersen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judith McGowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Kim Eheman / Susan Hoffman
2026-07-20 · CAS.Pedersen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dell Pinkston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · TOC.Clark · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Morten Pedersen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
60.7%
34W–22L · 55.4% of games
3.5
33.3%
16W–32L · 43.3% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
8W–8L · 53% of games
6.5
52.3%
23W–21L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
42 matches
#1 Singles
14%
25 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal