← Search

Katherine Goodson

— year-end
143 matches · 99W–44L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Katherine Goodson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-08-28 · Hermann/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kara Kolstad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-26 · Randolph/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kate Tharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
Shannon McCalla / Laura Wilson
2026-08-24 · Robinson/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · Randolph/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angie Wesley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · Robinson/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leah Kewley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-26 · Green/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Liza Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
David Goodwin / Janet Prentice
2026-07-24 · Snap/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Mattise mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · Simpson/Robinson/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbee Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Snap/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hitesh Dhingra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-05 · Simpson/Robinson/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbee Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · Snap/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Piovarcy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-16 · Feyes/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gouri Hiremath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams86 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
83.6%
56W–11L · 62.4% of games
4.5
32.4%
11W–23L · 42.2% of games
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.8% of games
8.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 57.3% of games
4.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 60.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova