← Search

Lisa Yawn

— year-end
96 matches · 52W–44L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lisa Yawn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Randolph/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cristin Hambidge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-26 · Randolph/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cristin Hambidge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-14 · Hermann/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kate Tharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-10 · Delves/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christy Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · Born to be Wild(wood) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristin Hambidge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · Delves/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bailey Cooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-03 · Delves/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Delves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-01 · Delves/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bailey Cooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · Delves/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Huskey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Born to be Wild(wood) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · Delves/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · Delves/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Teams64 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 58.5% of games
4.0
53.7%
22W–19L · 50.6% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
60%
6W–4L · 53.8% of games
7.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova