← Search

Kim Wise

— year-end
46 matches · 35W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kim Wise to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
Kelly Rounsaville / Melissa McDaniel
2026-08-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Shearer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · Schwartz-3.5-HRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Boykin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-20 · Schwartz-3.5-HRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Boykin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-02 · Rodgers-3.5-18's-HRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Boykin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-30 · Schwartz-3.5-HRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Boykin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-26 · Rodgers-3.5-18's-HRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-10-13 · Schwartz/Racquet Club/PB · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Shearer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-02 · Fink - Tatum · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carly Wise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-09-09 · Schwartz/Racquet Club/PB · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Shearer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-09-04 · Fink - Tatum · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carly Wise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-08-25 · Schwartz/Racquet Club/PB · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paula Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-08-18 · Schwartz/Racquet Club/PB · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paige Hutchinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
85.7%
18W–3L · 65.3% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 42.9% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 62.8% of games
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams