← Search

Emily Keleher

Bryn Mawr, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 17W–8L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Keleher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Haley Erdlen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-17 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-24 · Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Erdlen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-2
L
2025-06-20 · Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridget Hintze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-13 · Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Halpin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-06-06 · Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Erdlen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-05-30 · Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Erdlen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-05-24 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2024-05-10 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2024-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Yocum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-16 · Overbrook Aces · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2023-06-09 · Overbrook Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridget Hintze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
100%
7W–0L · 69.7% of games
3.5
50%
8W–8L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
8 matches
#1 Singles
28%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams