← Search

Carol DiBari

Wayne, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
320 matches · 216W–104L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Carol DiBari to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history320 matches
L
2026-09-09 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Eng Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Eng Chung championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Sarah Roberts / Simone Twombly
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Eng Chung championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-1
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Camila Gomes Santos Grilanda championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Ina Fricchione championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Netchix · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Ina Fricchione championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · Netchix · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elyse Salek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · Netchix 18+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
57.1%
16W–12L · 58.6% of games
3.0
69%
29W–13L · 59.4% of games
3.5
59.8%
64W–43L · 54.5% of games
4.0
75%
9W–3L · 51.8% of games
6.0mixed
94.1%
16W–1L · 70.1% of games
7.0mixed
88%
22W–3L · 69.1% of games
8.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
101 matches
#1 Singles
25%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
50 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
12 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer