← Search

Philippe Adams

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
155 matches · 81W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Philippe Adams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
W
2026-08-18 · Jo.Parham55C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeffery Troch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-27 · Jo.VanCampen18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Van Ness mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Jo.VanCampen18M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Briggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · Jo.VanCampen18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Hauge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-22 · Jo.VanCampen18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rose Whitehurst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · De.Meares18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Sage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-18 · Jo.VanCampen18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Hauge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
Jeff Chaffin / Joseph Smith
2026-05-14 · Ja.Sage40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dylan DeMacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
Scott St John / Scott Russell
2026-04-15 · Ja.Sage40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Klocke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-08 · Ja.Sage40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-02 · Ja.Sage40C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mark Camacho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-01 · Ja.Sage40A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Douglas Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
68.6%
24W–11L · 53.8% of games
4.5
24.4%
11W–34L · 41.9% of games
7.5
50%
8W–8L · 54.1% of games
8.5
75%
21W–7L · 54.9% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 49.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 50.4% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 63.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#1 Singles
10%
15 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert