← Search

Jason Sage

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
221 matches · 85W–136L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason Sage to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history221 matches
L
2026-09-02 · De.Meares40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Derek Meares
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-30 · Jo.VanCampen18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rhett Hartley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-12 · De.Meares40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Haynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-09 · Jo.VanCampen18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with John van Campen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · Te.McKee55M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Page mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Te.McKee55M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dolores Quesenberry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-01 · Te.McKee55M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Juli Korsnack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · Te.McKee55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dolores Quesenberry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · De.Meares18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Salisbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-17 · Te.McKee55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Juli Korsnack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-28 · De.Meares18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philippe Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-27 · Te.McKee55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Juli Korsnack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
31.1%
23W–51L · 45.6% of games
4.5
40%
4W–6L · 48.8% of games
7.5
46.2%
24W–28L · 48.3% of games
8.5
30.8%
12W–27L · 46.1% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 55.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
11W–11L · 47.8% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
65 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert