← Search

Anita Jilton

Jonesborough, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 43W–38L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Anita Jilton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Hinkle/META · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah LaGuardia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-06 · Hagood6.5/META · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Theresa Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-26 · Hinkle/META · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Beth Shults-kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · Hagood6.5/META · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Theresa Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · Thacker-Hinkle/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Dean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · Thacker-Hinkle/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirsten Hoskins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · Thacker-Hinkle/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ju Mo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · Thacker-Hinkle/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ju Mo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · Betancourt/META · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Heimbach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · Betancourt/META · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Austin Helton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · Betancourt/META · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Heimbach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
Jeff Moffatt / Madga Cox
2026-06-20 · Betancourt/META · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Austin Helton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 58.9% of games
3.5
44%
11W–14L · 49.1% of games
6.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 48.1% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 65.5% of games
3.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 58.9% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
20 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe