← Search

Anneke Self

Bristol, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 13W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Anneke Self to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Cox/META · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Holli Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · Janiszewski/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Janiszewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-12 · Greene-Lamb/Greeneville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neva Kilday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-05 · Greene-Lamb/Greeneville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neva Kilday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-27 · Greene-Lamb/Greeneville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joy Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-20 · Greene-Lamb/Greeneville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joy Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-19 · Janiszewski/META · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Betancourt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-19 · Cox/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holli Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · Janiszewski/META · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Janiszewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-12 · Cox/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holli Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-06 · Cox/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aileen Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-15 · Janiszewski/META · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Hagood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.1% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 59.9% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova