← Search

Barb Janiszewski

Jonesborough, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 14W–28L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Barb Janiszewski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Janiszewski-Betancourt/META · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brittini Thacker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-23 · Cox/META · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · Betancourt/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Hagood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-30 · Betancourt/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Betancourt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-23 · Betancourt/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Austin Helton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · Betancourt/META · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Blackstone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-28 · Betancourt/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dante de la Riva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-20 · Betancourt/META · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dante de la Riva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-19 · Janiszewski/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anneke Self
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-27 · Greene-Lamb/Greeneville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Raby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-13 · Greene-Lamb/Greeneville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Mitchel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-12 · Janiszewski/META · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anneke Self
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
22.7%
5W–17L · 36.6% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.4% of games
3.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.4% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 62% of the time
#3 Doubles
62%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal