← Search

Ben Shalz

— year-end
69 matches · 20W–49L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Ben Shalz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
L
2022-06-28 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Henson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-06-27 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dave Agler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-06-24 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jan Schiedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2022-06-21 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2022-06-14 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jan Schiedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2022-06-09 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Russell Sauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2022-06-08 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Emerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-07 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Russell Sauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-02 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alan Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-06-01 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Douglas Salerno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2022-05-24 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danny Size
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-05-11 · MSA Tecate (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Bermensolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
Teams13 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
44.4%
16W–20L · 45.9% of games
4.0
13%
3W–20L · 35.7% of games
8.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
18 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova