Jeffrey Habig
Boise, ID
101 matches · 63W–38L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Jeffrey Habig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history101 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
92%
23W–2L · 58.8% of games
4.0
45.5%
20W–24L · 46.6% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 52.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.