← Search

Elliott Hulscher

Rockledge, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 97W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elliott Hulscher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Rockledge - Zavaleta · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rich HOGARTH
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Kevin Villa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Kevin Villa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Kevin Villa championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Kenneth Moore / James Curzan Jr
2026-08-13 · EFSC - Flores · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-10 · EFSC - Flores · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elliott Hogans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · Rockledge - Zavaleta · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rich HOGARTH
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · EFSC - Flores · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Villa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · EFSC - Dahl · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Naomi Coleman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-07-07 · EFSC - Dahl · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maegan Hulscher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-02 · EFSC - Flores · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trey Crowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-15 · EFSC - Flores · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathan Hartnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
68.6%
35W–16L · 54.5% of games
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 68.3% of games
8.5
80%
12W–3L · 60.1% of games
9.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 34.2% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
28W–4L · 60.3% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
30 matches
#2 Male Doubles
5%
7 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Male Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe