← Search

Christopher Siege

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 128W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christopher Siege to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
W
2026-07-23 · NMAC.Fish · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maureen Sredl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-21 · NMAC.Fish · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Devon Siege mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · NMAC.Fish · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Devon Siege mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · ACP.Morrow · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Saillant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-29 · La.Brock40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · ACP.Morrow · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · ACP.Morrow · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Saillant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-04-08 · La.Brock40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Klemenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · ACP.Morrow · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Breazeale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-03-28 · ACP.Morrow · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Breazeale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-22 · ACP.Morrow · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lawrence Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-11-07 · #2 Doubles · with Mic Wallace championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
70.8%
63W–26L · 58.5% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
88.2%
15W–2L · 62.3% of games
8.5
64.3%
18W–10L · 57.1% of games
7.0mixed
100%
12W–0L · 70.3% of games
8.0mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
31 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe