← Search

Jacqueline Wolborsky

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 66W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jacqueline Wolborsky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Ma.Basil18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Noelle Hagen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-25 · Ma.Biringer18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christie Hartinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-18 · Ma.Biringer18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-17 · Ma.Basil18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tina Santospago
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-10 · Ma.Basil18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tina Santospago
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · Ma.Basil18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tina Santospago
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · Ta.LeFevre18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Wolborsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · Ta.LeFevre18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Wolborsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-11 · Ka.Conley40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-25 · Ta.LeFevre40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorrie Hareza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-23 · Ka.Conley40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-10 · Je.Dysart18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Wakeford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
66.7%
24W–12L · 55.4% of games
4.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 40.3% of games
6.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 51.1% of games
7.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 50.9% of games
3.5mixed
100%
10W–0L · 63.9% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
24 matches
#1 Singles
10%
11 matches
#2 Singles
8%
9 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova