← Search

Maggie Finney

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 34W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Maggie Finney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Ma.Finney18C6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hilary Trader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · Ma.Finney18C7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Makenna Edgington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-08-10 · Ma.Finney18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Sheldon Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-26 · Na.Wireback18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheldon Roberts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-12 · Na.Wireback18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ethan Steadman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Ma.Finney18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · Ma.Finney18S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Jocelyn Chiavola championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Pedrina Salinas / Kelsie Cappetta
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Jocelyn Chiavola championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Julia Szurnicki / Amy Wangerin
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · with Jocelyn Chiavola championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-11 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 47.7% of games
3.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 57.5% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 55.6% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 22% of the time
#1 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#2 Singles
17%
10 matches
#3 Singles
13%
8 matches
#1 Singles
8%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert