← Search

QUEEN HARGROVE

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
312 matches · 107W–205L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add QUEEN HARGROVE to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history312 matches
L
2026-07-18 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-11 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Krzeszewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-20 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-11 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Kethey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-30 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-07 · Pa.Hankerson18A3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · Pa.Hankerson18A3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-12 · Ja.Bolton-Cubillan18A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Kethey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-29 · Pa.Hankerson18A3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 35.5% of games
3.5
42.2%
57W–78L · 47.7% of games
4.0
25.9%
14W–40L · 42.1% of games
6.5
57.7%
15W–11L · 56.4% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
14.3%
4W–24L · 37.6% of games
8.5
6.5%
2W–29L · 24.6% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.6% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
116 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
99 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
70 matches
#3 Singles
5%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
7 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe