← Search

Connie Haynes

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 147W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Connie Haynes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history226 matches
L
2026-08-16 · ACP.Cambo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ragini Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-10 · Co.Haynes18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brianna Shait
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · St.Grose40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carrie Struble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Lukz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-17 · Ga.Fye40M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Haynes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · Ga.Fye40M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Haynes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Gessner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-27 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Lukz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-20 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Rini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-11 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Gessner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Rini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-28 · La.Fye18T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Gessner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
80%
20W–5L · 67.1% of games
3.0
75.9%
66W–21L · 62.5% of games
3.5
43.9%
18W–23L · 48.7% of games
5.5
100%
14W–0L · 73.5% of games
6.5
48%
12W–13L · 51.9% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
58 matches
#1 Singles
9%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
14 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal