← Search

Windy Dehem

— year-end
66 matches · 44W–22L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Windy Dehem to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
L
Becca McLeod / Jennifer Heller
2026-09-11 · RN-BLOODWORTH · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-04 · RN-BLOODWORTH · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
Jennifer Heller / Becca McLeod
2026-08-21 · RN-BLOODWORTH · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Velasquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-04 · HOCO-REYNOLDS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine Harless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-28 · HOCO - Wharton · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marlo Bautista
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-25 · HOCO - Wharton · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phil Hoang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · HOCO-REYNOLDS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine Harless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-11 · HOCO - Wharton · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marlo Bautista
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-04 · HOCO - Wharton · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marlo Bautista
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-30 · RN-Bloodworth · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-13 · RN-Bloodworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Roller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-27 · RN-Bloodworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Velasquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
66.1%
41W–21L · 59.8% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
30 matches
#1 Singles
23%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer