← Search

Courtney Williams

— year-end
137 matches · 68W–69L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Courtney Williams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
L
2026-08-31 · JDS-Williams/Prine · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaneji Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-25 · JDS-HEAD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Prine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-17 · JDS-Williams/Prine · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Prine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-10 · RN-MESERVEY · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tuti Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · IHC-BREWER · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Haley Claxton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-03 · RN-MESERVEY · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Terri Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-20 · JDS-HEAD · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Sanchez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · IHC-BREWER · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Brewer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-26 · IHC-BREWER · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Durkee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · RN-MESERVEY · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Bloodworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · JDS-HEAD · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with LaVella Head
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-23 · JDS Kearbey · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
Teams39 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 47.2% of games
3.0
61%
47W–30L · 54.2% of games
3.5
18.2%
4W–18L · 35.3% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 37.5% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
5W–5L · 46.7% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova