← Search

Danielle Cawood

Park Ridge, NJ
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 45W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Danielle Cawood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Carolyn Pinheiro championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-02 · Northern: Falcone · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susie Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · with Susie Choi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · Northern: Falcone · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susie Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
James Elliot / Jennifer Soliman
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · with Eric Cawood championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · Southern: WTLOV · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susie Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-02-01 · Southern: WTLOV · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Bamford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · with Eric Cawood championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-11-16 · MH:Total Tennis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Cawood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · MH:Total Tennis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Cawood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-10-18 · MH:Total Tennis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Cawood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.2% of games
4.0
51.3%
20W–19L · 49% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 62.5% of games
7.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 61.2% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#1 Singles
19%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#2 Singles
13%
11 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova