← Search

Michael Cremeans

— year-end
18 matches · 14W–4L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michael Cremeans to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
W
2026-07-19 · Sandman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Neil Mirchandani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · Logan 9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Charles Lavin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · Upper Dublin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Sandman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Khalev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-3
W
2026-06-16 · Ehrenberg · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with H William Danser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · Sandman · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Al Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-2
W
2026-06-07 · Sandman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Travis Sandman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · Ehrenberg · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with H William Danser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-31 · Sandman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kaptan Karsolia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Ehrenberg · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Al Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-12 · Ehrenberg · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Al Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-03 · Sandman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Neil Mirchandani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Teams4 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 60.2% of games
9.0
100%
5W–0L · 65.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
10 matches
#1 Singles
22%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King