← Search

Gabriel Topor

Berkeley Heights, NJ
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 12W–11L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gabriel Topor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Coyle/Mira · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sergey Shkop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Coyle/Mira · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sergey Shkop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · NJD/NJ Smash · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chris Soulios
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-26 · NJD/NJ Smash · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chris Soulios
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-12 · NJD/NJ Smash · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chris Soulios
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-08-12 · NJ: Ballboys · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Sandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-07-22 · Ballboys · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Berenbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-09 · Ballboys · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Berenbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-01 · Ballboys · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Berenbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-06-25 · Ballboys · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Henry Lanman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-17 · Ballboys · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Douglass Coyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-10 · Ballboys · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Soulios
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 46.6% of games
9.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
2 matches
#2 Singles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova