← Search

Michael O'Keefe

— year-end
133 matches · 57W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michael O'Keefe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-04-19 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sundeep Jayaprabhu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Becker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-22 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Mead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Mead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Albrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-23 · Masengill/Zoll (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Dana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-26 · Masengill/Zoll (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Hagenbrock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-12 · Masengill/Zoll (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Hagenbrock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-05-05 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Hagenbrock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-04-27 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Zoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-30 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Albrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-23 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Dana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Teams19 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
84.6%
22W–4L · 65.1% of games
3.5
35.7%
30W–54L · 45.1% of games
4.0
17.6%
3W–14L · 36% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
29 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams