← Search

Jeremy Mead

WILDWOOD, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 13W–17L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jeremy Mead to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-03-22 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael O'Keefe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael O'Keefe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-01 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-22 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Stickel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-01 · Masengill/Zoll (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Garrett Meggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-04 · Masengill/Trybula (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Brockmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-09 · Masengill/Trybula (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Frederick Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-09 · Masengill/Zoll (F) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-19 · Masengill/Trybula (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Frederick Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-10-19 · Masengill/Zoll (F) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-12 · Masengill/Trybula (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Frederick Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-09-07 · Masengill/Trybula (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darren Drexler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 55.1% of games
3.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#2 Singles
13%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer