← Search

Christopher Fikes

Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 48W–29L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Christopher Fikes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Rhoads/Set2Win (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Kuntz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · Tennis Freaks (Kamat) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tara Freese Clifford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · Tennis Freaks (Kamat) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tara Freese Clifford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
Scott Martin / Arjun Bhat
2026-07-20 · STL/Petruska/40&Over3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Burak Taysi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-10 · STL/Petruska/40&Over3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sanjeev Kamat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-06 · STL/Petruska/40&Over3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sanjeev Kamat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Tennis Freaks (Kamat) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tara Freese Clifford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · STL/Petruska/40&Over3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Hardebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-08 · STL/Petruska/40&Over3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Burak Taysi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-26 · Rhoads/Set2Win (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandon Edstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Rhoads/Set2Win (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandon Edstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · Rhoads/Set2Win (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 58.8% of games
3.5
65.7%
23W–12L · 54.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 54.9% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams