← Search

Ann Frantz

Franklin, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 17W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ann Frantz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Frantz/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Jirjis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · Frantz/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Jirjis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · Frantz/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Jirjis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Hayes/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ray Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
Sarah Griffin / Craig Kanwischer
2026-07-11 · Zhang/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Welch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-30 · Gilliam/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Hendry-Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · Gilliam/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Burnstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-21 · Zhang/Immordino/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerry Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
Ellen Gooden / David Adams
2026-06-14 · Zhang/Immordino/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerry Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-09 · Gilliam/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Amyx
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · Hayes/Murfreesboro · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · Zhang/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Gilles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
75%
6W–2L · 61% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 37% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.2% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 62.3% of games
4.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe