← Search

Jeanine Dyer

Smyrna, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 30W–39L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jeanine Dyer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Ossman/Doty/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-08-09 · Ossman/Doty/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · Lund/Murfreesboro · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stuart Littleton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · Ossman/Doty/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vesna Pavlovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · Lund/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt McCord mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · Lund/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stuart Littleton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · LaRoy/Lee/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-20 · LaRoy/Lee/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-23 · LaRoy/Lee/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-22 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-09-22 · Wishing/Murfreesboro · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joan Arney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-09-07 · Wishing/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 50.8% of games
4.0
36.4%
12W–21L · 46.4% of games
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 46.3% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 61.9% of games
4.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
12 matches
#1 Singles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer