← Search

Emily Madan

Ithaca, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 132W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Madan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · Yablonski · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-07-15 · Yablonski · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · Baseline bandits · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · Yablonski · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Irina Naydich championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Aija Leiponen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-15 · Syracuse: Get a Grip · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Meade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · Syracuse: Get a Grip · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-06-03 · Yablonski · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-01 · Syracuse: Get a Grip · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
75%
6W–2L · 60.6% of games
3.0
84%
21W–4L · 67.8% of games
3.5
80.3%
49W–12L · 63.3% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 45% of games
6.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 64.6% of games
7.0mixed
52.8%
19W–17L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
48 matches
#1 Singles
18%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
30 matches
#2 Singles
10%
19 matches
#1 Female Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe