← Search

Anne Crecelius

— year-end
38 matches · 10W–28L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Anne Crecelius to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2021-12-18 · KTC-Wiley · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Rhoads
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2021-10-31 · QRRC-Wiley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Letavec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2021-10-30 · KTC-Wiley · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim LaPole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2021-09-24 · QRRC-Wiley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Therese McNea-Wiley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2021-08-27 · KTC-Gustafson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2021-07-11 · KTC-Gustafson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2021-06-06 · KTC-Gustafson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deidra Boykin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2021-05-15 · QRRC-Wiley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Augustine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2021-05-01 · QRRC-Wiley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Rhoads
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2021-04-24 · QRRC-Wiley · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Rhoads
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2021-04-17 · QRRC-Wiley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2021-03-28 · QRRC-Wiley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Rhoads
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Teams6 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.7% of games
4.0
7.7%
1W–12L · 29.6% of games
6.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#1 Singles
13%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal