← Search

Kim LaPole

— year-end
253 matches · 86W–167L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim LaPole to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history253 matches
L
2026-05-23 · KTC-Witting · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zina Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-10 · SRTC Hovanec · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terrie Wiley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-21 · KTC Hattenbach · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Wineberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
Mary Miller / Melissa Pemberton
2025-10-17 · SRTC Hovanec · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Wager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2025-09-13 · KTC Hattenbach · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Stoermer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-19 · KTC Hattenbach · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-12 · KTC Hattenbach · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Letavec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-28 · KTC Hattenbach · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Stoermer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-06-21 · KTC Hattenbach · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Hovanec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-24 · KTC Hattenbach · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Duselis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-30 · KTC Hattenbach · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Duselis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-03-09 · SRTC Wilkins · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Avinne Kiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams71 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
50%
42W–42L · 51.1% of games
4.0
12.1%
8W–58L · 32% of games
6.5
50%
10W–10L · 47.2% of games
7.5
7.7%
1W–12L · 38.8% of games
7.0mixed
38.5%
20W–32L · 44.9% of games
8.0mixed
8.3%
1W–11L · 29.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
104 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
57 matches
#1 Singles
7%
17 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams