← Search

Ty Sanders

— year-end
77 matches · 61W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ty Sanders to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Chaney · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Cogar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-30 · Cha · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ramon Gan Lim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-26 · Cha · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ramon Gan Lim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-25 · Chaney · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Chaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Chaney · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Cogar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · Cha · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fengji Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-26 · Cha · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xavier Cha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-07 · Sanders · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Barnhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-30 · Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Jarvis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · Sanders · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Yoshimura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-25 · Sanders · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ross Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams27 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
90%
18W–2L · 68.3% of games
4.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 60.7% of games
6.5
100%
6W–0L · 69.9% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.2% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 66.4% of games
8.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 60.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#3 Singles
5%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova