← Search

James Appel

Churchton, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 40W–30L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add James Appel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Mixed Metaphors · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Draper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · Appel · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-28 · Appel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · Mixed Metaphors · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Laabs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · Feldtmose/Appel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Lay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-07-25 · Feldtmose/Appel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael McNees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-19 · Mixed Metaphors · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonnie Catalano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · Feldtmose/Appel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Rothstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · Feldtmose/Appel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael McNees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Feldtmose/Appel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaun Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-25 · Feldtmose/Appel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Rothstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 56.7% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 41% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 57.3% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.1% of games
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 45% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova