← Search

Hongbo Ma

Elkridge, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 70W–57L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Hongbo Ma to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
W
2026-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Henry Jiao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-24 · Khan - KTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rizwan Rashid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · Khan - KTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elliot Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-08 · Khan - KTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jagadish Akula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-24 · Khan - KTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Lincoln
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Khan - KTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Lincoln
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · Khan - KTA · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Mansfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-6
W
2026-06-07 · Khan - KTA · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jagadish Akula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · Kovalski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Albers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-03 · Khan - KTA · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandeep Duvedi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-02 · Khan - KTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jagadish Akula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · Kovalski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
52.8%
47W–42L · 52.5% of games
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.9% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 56.8% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 65.5% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.4% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
33 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert