← Search

Dan Michalski

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
364 matches · 179W–185L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dan Michalski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history364 matches
L
2026-08-15 · DESERT PALM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathryn Wilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-30 · DTC #1 · #3 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Miguel Calvillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-28 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Bosnos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · DESERT PALM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-07-14 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2 · #3 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with STEPHANE BIRY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · DESERT PALM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alexandria Chang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · DTC #1 · #3 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with JD de Armond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2 · #3 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with James Mcclary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Worrall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-30 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Schinabeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · #3 Doubles · with Kelley Ferrence championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · DESERT PALM · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Heather Hartzell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 43.3% of games
3.0
69.9%
51W–22L · 59.3% of games
3.5
53.4%
55W–48L · 52% of games
4.0
32.7%
17W–35L · 44.5% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 42.7% of games
5.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.4% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
12W–24L · 48.4% of games
6.5mixed
33.3%
7W–14L · 48.6% of games
7.0mixed
43.2%
16W–21L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
123 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
117 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
76 matches
#3 Male Doubles
5%
17 matches
#2 Male Doubles
4%
15 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova