← Search

Andrew Leslie

Kansas City, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 20W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrew Leslie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Woodard, Avery · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zachary Schmitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Ram Gottapu / Joseph Bui
2026-08-27 · Woodard, Avery · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zachary Schmitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · Woodard, Avery · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Schmitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-06 · Woodard, Avery · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zachary Schmitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Joseph Bui / Jay Caple
2026-07-16 · Woodard, Avery · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Klaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Woodard, Avery · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samuel Barth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · Woodard, Avery · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samuel Barth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-14 · Burgess, Randy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · Burgess, Randy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-14 · Burgess, Randy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Burgess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-02-07 · Burgess, Randy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Schemmel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-17 · Burgess, Randy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games
4.0
23.1%
18W–60L · 41.2% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
10 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal