← Search

Andrew Reed

Leawood, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 31W–22L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Andrew Reed to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Nagy, Kyle · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · Nagy, Kyle · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Pena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Ram Gottapu / Joseph Bui
2026-08-03 · Nagy, Kyle · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · Nagy, Kyle · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Pena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · Cook, Brad · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Pena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Cook, Brad · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-04 · Cook, Brad · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
Aaron Keepes
2026-05-07 · Cook, Brad · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
Thomas Ohnemus / Kevin Jackson
2026-04-30 · Cook, Brad · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Stathis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-04-09 · Cook, Brad · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Pena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-20 · Schwabauer, Doug · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcella Prock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-06 · Schwabauer, Doug · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcella Prock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
3.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 61.5% of games
4.0
36%
9W–16L · 46.1% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#1 Singles
15%
8 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert