← Search

Chan Townsend

Olathe, KS
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
205 matches · 130W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chan Townsend to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history205 matches
L
2026-06-02 · Griffey, Jacque · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer VanMeter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · Griffey, Jacque · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chriss Shoup-Duntz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · Griffey, Jacque · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rhonda Bonner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
Lorie Zacharias-Verdi / Linda Johnson
2026-05-09 · Griffey, Jacque · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Allison Salmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-26 · Griffey, Jacque · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Allison Salmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-04-12 · Griffey, Jacque · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jennifer VanMeter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-22 · Griffey, Jacque · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-01 · Griffey, Jacque · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-4, 1-0
L
2025-12-02 · VanMeter, Jennifer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacque Griffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-16 · Griffey, Jacque · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-11-09 · Griffey, Jacque · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Terriquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-10-21 · VanMeter, Jennifer · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.3% of games
4.0
75.4%
101W–33L · 60.7% of games
4.5
37.2%
16W–27L · 45% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
84 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
54 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova