← Search

Theresa Nelson

— year-end
111 matches · 62W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Theresa Nelson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-06-09 · Fendler, Kathleen · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathleen Fendler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-29 · Ernst, Scott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-20 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Sandefur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · Ernst, Scott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dylan Lockwood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-05 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kandice Thurman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-21 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sanja Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-02-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-14 · Blackwell, Tiffany · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiffany Blackwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-12-02 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Falkner Axelrod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-11-09 · Blackwell, Tiffany · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Annie Polizzi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Teams30 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 58.8% of games
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 62.6% of games
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.7% of games
4.0
70%
28W–12L · 59.5% of games
4.5
40.8%
20W–29L · 47.9% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 44.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer