← Search

Jill Waldman

Leawood, KS
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 61W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Waldman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-07-20 · #2 Doubles · with Anne Hope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Clarice Clash / Susie Anderson
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Anne Hope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Clarice Clash / Susie Anderson
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Anne Hope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Tracey K Trembath / Lori Brewer
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Anne Hope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · HOA/Gifford/55&over9.0W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tracey Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · HOA/Gifford/55&over9.0W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anne Hope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-06 · Creel, Stephen · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas Verdi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-01-30 · Creel, Stephen · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas Verdi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-17 · #3 Doubles · with Anne Hope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Laurie Alfrey / Janet Chambers
2025-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Chan Townsend championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-14 · HOA/Gifford/55&over9.0W · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Missy Moody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-04-26 · HOA/Gifford/55&over9.0W · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chan Townsend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 55% of games
4.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 75.9% of games
5.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 54.2% of games
9.0
100%
10W–0L · 78.4% of games
9.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#1 Singles
10%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert