← Search

Karen Spiegel

— year-end
138 matches · 96W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Spiegel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
W
2026-08-15 · LWR Cherry Ranchers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nia Esposito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · LWR Liquid Ranchers · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Feingold Navas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-11 · LWR Combositos 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Casey Baynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-23 · LWR Liquid Ranchers · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-18 · LWR Cherry Ranchers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nia Esposito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · LWR Liquid Ranchers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · LWR Esposito · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Bloch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-19 · LWR McAloon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-18 · LWR Cherry Ranchers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Bloch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-10 · LWR McAloon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-03-20 · LWR 18 Evening · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Rain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-28 · LWR Nicholson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Feingold Navas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
70%
28W–12L · 54.9% of games
3.5
89.5%
17W–2L · 67.6% of games
4.0
69.2%
36W–16L · 53.8% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 58.2% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
30 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert