Angie Namack
Fishers, IN
57 matches · 24W–33L · seasons 2019–2023
Captains: add Angie Namack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history57 matches
W
Anita Schneider / Rebecca Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
Whitney Land / Roxanne Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
51.4%
19W–18L · 50.8% of games
4.5
20%
3W–12L · 28.9% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#1 Singles
14%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.