← Search

Lynn Hobbs

— year-end
126 matches · 69W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lynn Hobbs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
W
2026-07-22 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W CRC Hobbs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Richman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Corbin-Mahaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Barrett · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Moschel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Terri Shea / Beth Smith
2026-07-06 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brandyn Ohrvall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Barrett · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Moschel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · Indy A40 4.0W CRC Hobbs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Crouter-Clouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Reifeis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-26 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Barrett · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Grable
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · Indy A55 8.0W CRC Trott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams17 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
70.5%
31W–13L · 59% of games
4.5
37.8%
14W–23L · 48% of games
7.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.8% of games
8.0
80%
8W–2L · 63.5% of games
8.5
25%
2W–6L · 40.4% of games
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
40%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer