← Search

Greg Bosch

Malvern, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 23W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Greg Bosch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-07-11 · Doylestown 4.5 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Taboada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-24 · Smashers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Steger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-21 · Doylestown 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Taboada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · Smashers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephane Ritz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-17 · Tennis Rodman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Steger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · Doylestown 4.5 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Taboada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-07 · Tennis Rodman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Steger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frederick Herman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
Wendell Holland / Malcolm Sutherland
2025-08-10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Grosso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jimmy Kaufman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Kevin Irwin / Jose Fernando Martinez
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Taboada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-06-15 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Anapol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
100%
7W–0L · 62% of games
4.5
7.4%
2W–25L · 30.5% of games
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 59.3% of games
9.0
0%
0W–7L · 38% of games
8.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 60.3% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
18 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert