← Search

Daniel Taboada

FORT WASHINGTON, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 119W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Daniel Taboada to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
L
2026-07-18 · Doylestown 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Yevgen Knyazkov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-11 · Doylestown 4.5 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Greg Bosch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · Tennis Rodman · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-10 · Smashers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Steger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · Tennis Rodman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Spergel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-21 · Doylestown 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Greg Bosch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-20 · Grass Stains · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mauricio Delgado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · Tennis Rodman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sourin Banerji
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · Doylestown 4.5 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Greg Bosch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-03 · Tennis Rodman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Spergel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · Smashers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Loan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · Tennis Rodman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Craig Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
80%
8W–2L · 59.3% of games
3.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 55.7% of games
4.0
72.5%
74W–28L · 59.6% of games
4.5
25%
4W–12L · 37.5% of games
8.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 60.9% of games
9.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.4% of games
9.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 64% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
25 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert