← Search

David Steger

Media, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 57W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Steger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
W
2026-07-10 · Smashers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Taboada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · Smashers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Greg Bosch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-17 · Tennis Rodman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Greg Bosch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-27 · Tennis Rodman · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Spergel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-18 · Tennis Rodman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Taboada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Tennis Rodman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Greg Bosch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-30 · Tennis Rodman · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Spergel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-24 · Tennis Rodman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Taboada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-16 · Penn 1s · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rosemary Kearney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-10-25 · Upper Dublin 2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlie Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Jose Miguel Sacin / Justin Dorsk
2025-10-19 · #3 Doubles · with Christopher Jones championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-09-20 · Upper Dublin 2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Neal Rutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 59.8% of games
4.5
18.2%
4W–18L · 36.3% of games
8.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 61% of games
9.0
10%
1W–9L · 37.4% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 57.3% of games
9.0mixed
48.3%
14W–15L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe