← Search

Bea Barnes

Centennial, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 62W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bea Barnes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-06-23 · VCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Groves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-12 · RRTC RED · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Traci Heffron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · VCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · RRTC RED · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tanya Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-02 · VCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danelle Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-29 · RRTC RED · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tanya Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · VCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · VCC RED · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-22 · RRTC RED · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · RRTC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Inge Bentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · VCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-07 · RRTC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Inge Bentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
53.3%
40W–35L · 51.8% of games
8.0
50%
11W–11L · 53.7% of games
8.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 46.8% of games
8.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches
#1 Singles
10%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King