← Search

Sherry Ertelt

Highlands Ranch, CO
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
87 matches · 41W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sherry Ertelt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
Laura MacKe / Denise Gebes
2026-08-05 · SS-H ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marty Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · SS-H ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marty Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Jill Hanafee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Jill Geist championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-08 · SS-H ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marty Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Denise Gebes / Laura MacKe
2026-07-01 · SS-H ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Geist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · SS-LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Geist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-05-29 · SS-LT BLUE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karol Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-22 · SS-LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Hanafee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · SS-LT BLUE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Geist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Christina Harrison / Karen Owings-Yoder
2026-03-18 · 8.0 PC Welsh W65S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Nielson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-25 · 8.0 PC Welsh W65S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Camozzi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
60%
6W–4L · 50% of games
4.5
48.4%
15W–16L · 46.5% of games
8.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 58.3% of games
9.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.4% of games
8.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova