← Search

Alissa Joseph

Jackson, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 79W–32L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Alissa Joseph to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Otto, Jen · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Grace Nicaud Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · Rector, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Owen Mullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-06 · Rector, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna Fiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-05 · Otto, Jen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stacie Rector
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-25 · Rector, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Otto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-21 · Rector, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Otto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · Howell, Bryan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chandler Strain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · McCoy, Landon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Niven Walker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-07-08 · Rector, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carley Fetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
Mitch Rayborn / Mary Taylor
2026-06-22 · Howell, Bryan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chandler Strain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-17 · Rector, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · Rector, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carley Fetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 45% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
95.2%
40W–2L · 67.2% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
50%
12W–12L · 47.4% of games
4.0mixed
66.7%
14W–7L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova